Geeslin v. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McHUGH, Justice:
Daniel Geeslin appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which denied him compensation benefits on the ground that his injury was a result of his willful misconduct and, therefore, not compensable. We find the Appeal Board clearly erroneous in its application of the law, and reverse and remand.
Geeslin was injured during a fight with Nathan Koons, a foreman employed by ap-pellee, Irvin H. Whitehouse & Sons Co., a commercial painting firm. The setting and events leading up to the altercation are important to the resolution of this appeal. Koons and Geeslin…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
- Mathews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Triad Painting Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Woods v. Harry B. Woods Plumbing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Franklin v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Currence v. Wolf Run Mining, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2020
- Franklin v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.