Legal Opinion

Geeslin v. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1982No. 15287PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Justice:

Daniel Geeslin appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which denied him compensation benefits on the ground that his injury was a result of his willful misconduct and, therefore, not compensable. We find the Appeal Board clearly erroneous in its application of the law, and reverse and remand.

Geeslin was injured during a fight with Nathan Koons, a foreman employed by ap-pellee, Irvin H. Whitehouse & Sons Co., a commercial painting firm. The setting and events leading up to the altercation are important to the resolution of this appeal. Koons and Geeslin…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Mathews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Triad Painting Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Woods v. Harry B. Woods Plumbing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Franklin v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Currence v. Wolf Run Mining, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2020
  5. Franklin v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API