Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Sundowner

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 30, 2000No. 94,157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReif, J.

11 Claimant Henry A. Thomas seeks review of the trial court's order that denied his claim. The trial court held that Claimant's injuries at work fell within "the exception to compensability [under] 85 O.S. § 11(4)." 1 The trial court concluded "claimant was not a mere innocent victim to the altercation (fight) that ensued between himself and [a co-worker} which resulted in injuries." The trial court based this conclusion on a finding that "claimant had uttered extensive 'fighting words' prior to the alleged incident (altercation)" which provided "provocation" for the co-worker to strike…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Brister v. Barton and Rich Drilling CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cox Communications v. WilliamsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Pham v. Wuu Jau Company Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API