Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Kazuo Yanagita and Marc Choyei Kondo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 30, 1977No. 670, Docket 76-1405PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:
This appeal concerns the timeliness of claims by witnesses under 18 U.S.C. § 3504 1 that their examination was to be based upon the products of unlawful surveillance and the scope of the government’s duty under that statute to “affirm or deny” the existence of illegal wiretapping in response to requests first made on the day the witnesses were required by subpoena to appear and testify in a criminal trial. We hold that under the circumstances of this case their requests were untimely and that in any event the affidavit of an Assistant United States Attorney based on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Leonard James and Otto SeboldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. John David GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Pedro Saade, United States of America v. Carlos Zenon RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Involving Eve RosahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Martin Flanagan. United States of America v. Martin FlanaganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.