Legal Opinion

People v. United States Fire Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 2015No. F070771PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KANE, Acting P. J.

In this bail bond case, appellant United States Fire Insurance Company (Surety) appeals from a summary judgment entered against it on a forfeited bail bond of $25,000. Surety claims the summary judgment was premature, and hence improper, because it was entered while Surety’s motion for an extension of time under Penal Code section 1305.4 was pending. According to Surety, the improper summary judgment was voidable and should have been set aside pursuant to Surety’s timely request for that relief in the trial court. The trial court disagreed and left the summary…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hubbard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. Financial Casualty & SuretyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Cnty. of L. A. v. Allegheny Cas. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Allegheny Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. People v. Accredited Surety & Casualty Company, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API