K.R. v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWerdegar, J.
*298In 1978, this court established a basic background rule applicable to plea negotiations in criminal cases, holding that "[a]s a general principle ... whenever a judge accepts a plea bargain and retains sentencing discretion under the agreement, an implied term of the bargain is that sentence will be imposed by that judge." (People v. Arbuckle (1978) 22 Cal.3d 749, 756-757, 150 Cal.Rptr. 778, 587 P.2d 220 (Arbuckle ).) We later found the same rule applied to pleas in juvenile court. (In re Mark L. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 171, 177, 193 Cal.Rptr. 165, 666 P.2d 22 (Mark L. ).) In the ensuing years, some…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. CaballeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. Becerra, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Bueno, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- (HC) Serrato v. C. KoenigDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- In re A.L. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Alvarado CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.