Legal Opinion

Schramm v. Liebenberg

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1908No. 5366; No. 3015 C. APublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Yuma County. Hon James- 8. Hendrie, Judge. Action by A. J. Liebenberg against E. Yon Horrnm Schramm and the Farmers ’ Exchange. From a judgment for plaintiff in the county court on appeal from the justice’s court, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

This action was commenced in a justice court, whence an appeal was taken to the county court, where judgment was rendered ’against appellant, defendant below, from which is this appeal.

It appears from the evidence introduced by appellee that the Farmers’ Exchange was a country store at Yuma, Colorado, of which appellant Schramm, residing in New York City, was the owner and proprietor, and M. F. Orum, of Yuma, Colorado, sole manager. Orum was also in charge of Schramm’s ranch, cattle and horse interests.

June 22, 1903, appellee loaned to the Farmers’ Exchange $200.00, taking the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins & Douglas v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Breed v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  3. Perkins v. BoothbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
  4. Gates Iron Works v. Denver Engineering Works Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montrose Land & Investment Co. v. Greeley National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Ruedy v. Alamosa National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  5. Citizens State Bank v. Minnesota Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API