Legal Opinion
London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 16, 1928No. 11,990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Denison
The commission overruled their referee and awarded compensation to one Palmos for hernia. The district court affirmed the award and the insurer brings error.
The claim for reversal .is based on two points: (1) That Palmos did not suffer accidental hernia, and: (2) that he did not file his claim within six months after the alleged accident. The accident occurred June 11, 1926. No claim for compensation was filed till February 2, 1927.
It is argued that the plaintiff in' error had no right to defend against the claim because it did not file notice of contest under the commission’s rule VIII.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. W. A. Hover & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Sigel-Campion Live Stock Commission Co. v. ArdohainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Schramm v. LiebenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Butler v. MarshSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schrabauer v. Schneider Engraving Product, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Workers' Compensation Claim of Seckman v. Wyo-Ben, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Weidensaul v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. NewmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Leziac v. Buckeye Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1943