Legal Opinion
Ruedy v. Alamosa National Bank
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 6, 1925No. 10,835PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
On Rehearing.
The Alamosa National Bank obtained a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage on land in Rio Grande county, and certain of the defendants bring error.
The principal points relied on for reversal are: (1) There had been a previous foreclosure of the same mortgage; (2) the mortgage note had been satisfied; (3) the bank had no title to the mortgage note.
The essential facts are as follows: January 18, 1916, Thomas made a mortgage to Kilgore. October 1, 1917, Thomas contracted with Smith to sell the mortgaged land to him on terms with deferred payments. October 6, 1917, Smith assigned the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Galloway v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Union Gold Mining Co. v. Rocky Mountain National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
- Thredgill v. PintardSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Breed v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
- Foster v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rock Wool Insulating Company v. HustonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Montrose Land & Investment Co. v. Greeley National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- U.S. Bank v. HurseyWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Home Builders Co. v. ReddinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
- Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926