Logan v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
Beneficiaries of deceased insured appeal from a judgment in favor of the insurer after the trial court held that as to the accidental death benefit, the intoxication and felony exclusions of the policy were valid. The main question on appeal is whether the insurer was entitled to deny coverage on the basis of these two exclusions that had never been communicated to the decedent. We have concluded that the judgment must be reversed as under the circumstances of the instant case, the exclusions were not within the reasonable expectation of the insured in his purchase of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Young v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Barker v. California-Western States Life Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Young v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3Cited by26 opinions
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Smith v. Westland Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Fields v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Underwriters Insurance v. PurdieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Jarvis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.