Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Zalinka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 3, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance *630Appeal Board, filed October 4, 2000, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance •benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant declined a permanent position as a computer programmer due to the limited daytime travel required of the position. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. We affirm. It is well settled that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MannettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of WojcikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GiovatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of LutaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. In re the Claim of FlorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. In re the Claim of LyndAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API