Legal Opinion

People v. Bizieff

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1991No. Docket Nos. F010690, F013153PublishedCited by 6 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J. *

Appeal

Statement of the Case

Appellant Nicholas Bizieff was convicted after a jury trial of three counts of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). * 1 In addition, the allegations that he previously had been convicted of a serious felony (§§ 667, subd. (a), 1192.7, subd. (c)(1), (8)) and had served a prior separate prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) were found to be true. Throughout the proceedings, appellant was dissatisfied with appointed counsel and made five Marsden (People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 [84 Cal.Rptr. 156, 465 P.2d 44]) motions, which were denied. After trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. People v. HathcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Osswald v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Stenseth v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. MarkleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Marquis Durrell Jennings v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API