Stenseth v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
Plaintiff Dr. Jon Stenseth filed the instant action against defendant Wells Fargo Bank for allowing plaintiff’s employee to cash insurance checks on his forged endorsement. The jury found in favor of plaintiff. On appeal defendant raises issues relating to the admissibility and sufficiency of the evidence. Plaintiff has filed a cross-appeal and contends the trial court erred by excluding evidence of the amount of damages attributable to the time and effort he spent in uncovering the theft. We find the portion of the judgment awarding plaintiff $25,040 in damages must be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Gerard C. Menichini, T/a Best Legal Services v. Lissa L. Grant Mellon Bank (East), Mellon Bank (East) National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Hedstrom v. Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Posten v. RassetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Munoz v. City of Union CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Diffey v. Riverside County Sheriff's DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Capital Express Lines, Inc. v. Chase Bank, N.ADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.