Legal Opinion

Pottstown Borough v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1941No. Appeal, No. 286PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This appeal is concerned (1) with the procedure to be followed by a borough which seeks to acquire the ownership of the works and property of a company furnishing water to the public in the borough, with special reference to the time when it must secure the consent of the Public Utility Commission to such acquisition. And, also, (2) how this is affected by the fact that the proceedings for the acquisition of such property were begun when the Public Service Company Law of July 26, 1913, P. L. 1374, and its amendments and supplements were in force and effect, but were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bellevue Borough v. Ohio Valley Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. New Brighton Borough v. New Brighton Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Williamsport v. Citizens' Water & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Reynoldsville Boro. v. Reynoldsville Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Waynesboro Water Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Middletown Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Sayre Land Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Womelsdorf Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. White Oak Borough Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API