Legal Opinion

Hain v. Mullin

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2006No. 05-5039PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

We granted initial en banc hearing of this case to consider the reach of 21 U.S.C. § 848(q)(4)(B), which provides federally-funded counsel for indigent state death row prisoners seeking federal habeas relief. Specifically, § 848(q)(4)(B) authorizes “the appointment of one or more attorneys and the furnishing of such other services in accordance with” 21 U.S.C. § 848(q)(8). Section (q)(8) of the statute in turn commands that “each attorney so appointed shall represent the defendant throughout every subsequent stage of available judicial proceedings, including ...…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Harbison v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United States v. HinckleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Ruiz-TerrazasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Ellis v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. National Credit Union Administration Board v. Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API