Legal Opinion

United States v. Ruiz-Terrazas

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 26, 2007No. 06-2138PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

Javier Ruiz-Terrazas contends that the district court erred when it failed to articulate its reasons for rejecting his arguments, based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), that a sentence below the range recommended by the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“USSG” or the “Guidelines”) was warranted. Mr. Ruiz-Terrazas also argues that sentences falling within the Guidelines’ advisory ranges should not be presumed reasonable and that the district court impermissibly “double counted” his criminal history by using it to calculate not just his proper criminal…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. United States v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Lopez-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Verdin-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Martinez-BarraganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API