Frank v. State of New York
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, DECISION AND ORDER
McAYOY, Chief Judge.
This case presents the question of whether expert testimony concerning “multiple chemical sensitivity” (“MCS”) is inadmissible as a matter of law under the Federal Rules of Evidence in an action brought pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”).
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions are former employees of defendant New York State Department of Taxation and Finance (“the Department”). Plaintiff Kathleen Frank was employed by the Department as a Supervisor of Data Processing at the time of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Cherrye Bradley v. Pickens BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Ralph Underwager and Hollida Wakefield v. Anna SalterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Bradley v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cynthia Madej v. Jeff MaidenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- McNeel v. Union Pacific R. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Coffey v. County of HennepinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Bahura v. S.E.W. InvestorsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bernardoni v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.