Legal Opinion

Bahura v. S.E.W. Investors

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 2000No. 96-CV-418, 96-CV-490, 96-CV-513, 96-CV-1142 and 96-CV-1143PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge.

In 1990 and 1991, a group of twenty plaintiffs, who included employees of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and spouses of EPA employees, brought these consolidated actions against the owners and managers of the buildings housing the EPA’s national headquarters. The employee-plaintiffs claimed to have suffered neurological injuries as a result of their inhalation at the workplace of allegedly contaminated indoor air. The spouses’ claims were predicated on alleged loss of consortium. In October 1998, the cases of five representative employee-plaintiffs, and of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Williams v. BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Argenbright Security, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Roark Ex Rel. Roark v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. Brin v. S.E.W. InvestorsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Watson v. Inco Alloys International, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API