Legal Opinion

Coffey v. County of Hennepin

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 10, 1998No. Civil 3-96-1191 (PAM/JGL)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MAGNUSON, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court' upon Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the Court grants Defendants’ motion.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Coffey filed the present lawsuit against Defendants after the EEOC dismissed two of Plaintiffs charges in which she alleged discrimination by Hennepin County. Defendants then filed their first motion for summary judgment. This Court granted the motion in part and denied it in part. (See Coffey v. County of Hennepin, No. 3-96-1191 (D.Minn. Apr.30, 1998)) (order granting summary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cynthia Madej v. Jeff MaidenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Hannan v. Pest Control Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Meara v. BennettDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  4. McNeel v. Union Pacific R. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Bernardoni v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API