Legal Opinion

Donahue v. State

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 24, 1992No. 10283PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment setting aside a verdict awarding the plaintiff $866 in damages. The trial court, after concluding that the award was inadequate, ordered that the verdict be set aside and a new trial conducted on the issue of damages unless the defendant filed an additur of $10,634. See General Statutes § 52-228b.1 After the time limited by the court for filing the additur expired, the plaintiff successfully moved to set the verdict aside and for a new trial limited to the issue of damages. This appeal followed.

The defendant claims that the trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palomba v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Healy v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Camp v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. Jacobs v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. O'BRIEN v. SeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shegog v. ZabreckyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  2. Mack v. LaValleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. Caciopoli v. AcamporaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Purzycki v. Town of FairfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Cohen v. Town of HamdenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API