Legal Opinion
Brinkerhoff v. Aloe
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 12, 1892No. 85PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
146 U.S. 515
13 S.Ct. 221
36 L.Ed. 1068
BRINKERHOFF et al.
v.
ALOE.
No. 85.
December 12, 1892.
Suit by Milford H. Brinkerhoff and Willie C. Brinkerhoff, executors of Alexander W. Brinkerhoff, deceased, against Albert S. Aloe, for infringement of a patent. The circuit court held that the patent was void for want of invention, and because of anticipation by prior devices, and dismissed the bill. 37 Fed. Rep. 92. Complainants appealed. Affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion delivered below by THAYER, J., which is here given in full:
1
'This is a bill to restrain the infringement of letters patent No.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Metropolitan Wringing Mach. Co. v. YoungU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1876
- Brinkerhoff v. AloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3Cited by41 opinions
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Office Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Fenton Metallic Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rubber Tire Wheel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Decca Limited v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.