Metropolitan Wringing Mach. Co. v. Young
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
[This was a bill by the Metropolitan Wringing Machine Company against James Young and others to restrain the infringement of certain letters patent.]
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, District Judge.
The complainants are the owners of letters patent [No. 61,680] originally issued, on the invention of Alby H. Page, January 29th, 1867, for an “improvement in clothes wringers,” and reissued [No. 5,223] to the Metropolitan Washing Machine Company, January 7th, 1873, in three divisions. The improvement relates to a device for fastening the wringers to tubs of various sizes. Infringement is predicated upon the first claim only in the reissued patent, division A, the other ¿aims having been abandoned on the argument. That claim reads as follows: “In a wringer having a…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Brinkerhoff v. AloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brinkerhoff v. AloeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1888
- Dodge Coal Storage Co. v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1905
- Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. Consolidated Car Heating Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1908
- West Coast Safety Faucet Co. v. Jackson Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902