Brinkerhoff v. Aloe
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE QIRCUIT • COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. This was a bill to restrain the infringement of letters patent No. 224,991, granted to Alexander "W. Brinkerhoff under date of March 2, 1880, for an improvement in “ rectal specula.” The claims made.in'the specification were as follows: “ 1; A slide in the side of a speculum extending through its whole length, and used substantially as herein described.
Read the full summary
APPEAL PROM THE QIRCUIT • COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. This was a bill to restrain the infringement of letters patent No. 224,991, granted to Alexander "W. Brinkerhoff under date of March 2, 1880, for an improvement in “ rectal specula.” The claims made.in'the specification were as follows: “ 1; A slide in the side of a speculum extending through its whole length, and used substantially as herein described. “ 2.' The incline in the front fend of the chamber, in combination with the tube, slot and slide, substantially as and for the purposes herein set…
1Opinion of the Court
The Chief Justice:
Having reached the same conclusions as those expressed in the opinion of the Circuit Court, reported in 37 Fed. Rep. 92, we direct the decree to be
Affirmed.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Brinkerhoff v. AloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892