Legal Opinion
Ben J. v. City of Salina
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided June 5, 2009No. 99,791PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
This appeal requires us to determine the standard of review to be applied by a district court when considering an appeal from a determination of relocation benefits under the Kansas Relocation Assistance for Persons Displaced by Acquisition of Real Property Act, K.S.A. 58-3501 etseq. (Kansas Act). The district court rejected the displaced property owners’ argument that K.S.A. 58-3509(a), which provides an “appeal to the district court shall be a trial de novo,” entitled them to a new trial and determined the separation of powers doctrine…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. First City National Bank of HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Kansas State Board of Healing Arts v. FooteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State, Department of Game, Fish & Parks v. Troy TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- University of Kansas Hospital Authority & Kansas University Physicians, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Stueckemann v. City of BasehorSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Ben J. v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.