Legal Opinion
Judd v. Federal Communications Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 16, 2010No. Civil Action 10-0837 (PLF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on pro se plaintiff Keith Russell Judd’s Complaint for a Declaratory Judgment, Injunction, and Damages. 1 The complaint in- eludes a request for a three-judge court. Upon consideration of the complaint, the Court concludes that a three-judge court should not be empaneled and that Counts One, Four, Five, Six and Seven of plaintiffs complaint should be dismissed.
The plaintiff makes seven claims for relief in his complaint. 2 Numerous of these claims are requests for the Court to declare various statutes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Goosby v. OsserSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Texas Alliance for Home Care Services v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Judd v. Federal Communications CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hassan v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012