Legal Opinion

Pullman v. Railway Equipment Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 27, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Garnishment, against stockholders of a corporation by creditors. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. William Gr. Ewing, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

The users herein, having recovered judgments against the Eailway Equipment Company, garnishment suits were brought against plaintiffs in error and others, based on said judgments. These suits were consolidated, and on a trial before the court, without a jury, there were findings of $2,500 and $250, respectively, against plaintiffs in error, William C. Pullman and Margaret Allan Pullman, on which judgments were entered, from which these writs of error were sued out. The causes were heard in this court as one case, on the same record abstracts and briefs in each case. Divers errors are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Republic Life Insurance v. SwigertIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Capes v. BurgessIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bouton v. DementIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Thebus v. SmileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Gregg v. SavageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce v. FranklinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. Ryerson v. PedenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
  3. Provident Trust Co. v. Crouse, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API