Legal Opinion

Capes v. Burgess

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1890PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Wbit of Bbbob to the Appellate Court for the Third District ;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Alfbed Sample, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Haynes, Gordon & Co., having obtained judgment in the Circuit Court of McLean county against Charles Capes for $2050 and costs, and having had execution issued thereon and returned unsatisfied, sued out a writ of garnishment and caused Robert Burgess and Charles Burgess, copartners doing business under the firm name of Burgess Brothers, to be summoned as garnishees. Said garnishees, by their answer, denied having in their possession, custody or charge, any lands, goods, chattels, moneys, choses in action, credits or effects of said Capes, or being in any way indebted to him, but admitted, in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coalfield Co. v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. National Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. TeelTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Waples-Platter Grocer Co. v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Zimek v. Illinois National Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Wilde v. MahaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Powell Ex Rel. Anderson v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API