Brown v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
A jury convicted appellant of possession with intent to deliver N-hydroxy-3, 4-me-thylenedioxyamphetamine, also known as ecstasy. After finding the enhancement allegation to be true, the jury assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement for twenty-five years and a fine of $5,000.00. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction after finding the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to continue prosecuting the case after she testified as a witness in the case. Brawn v. State, 883 S.W.2d 389, 391…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Pannell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Beasley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
3Cited by42 opinions
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- House v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Abdygapparova v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
- Ramon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.