Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1996No. 1338-94PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of possession with intent to deliver N-hydroxy-3, 4-me-thylenedioxyamphetamine, also known as ecstasy. After finding the enhancement allegation to be true, the jury assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement for twenty-five years and a fine of $5,000.00. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction after finding the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to continue prosecuting the case after she testified as a witness in the case. Brawn v. State, 883 S.W.2d 389, 391…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Pannell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Beasley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. House v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Abdygapparova v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  5. Ramon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API