Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1995No. 540-93PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant of murder, pursuant to V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 19.02, and sentenced him to life imprisonment. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed by the Sixth Court of Appeals. Armstrong v. State, 838 S.W.2d 323 (Tex.App. — Texarkana 1992), vacated on other grounds, 845 S.W.2d 909 (Tex. Cr.App.), on remand 850 S.W.2d 230 (Tex. App. — Texarkana 1993). On appeal appellant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial based on misconduct by both a juror and the prosecutor during voir dire. The court of…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. De La Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Gentry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Enriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by150 opinions

  1. Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Fry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API