Armstrong v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellant of murder, pursuant to V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 19.02, and sentenced him to life imprisonment. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed by the Sixth Court of Appeals. Armstrong v. State, 838 S.W.2d 323 (Tex.App. — Texarkana 1992), vacated on other grounds, 845 S.W.2d 909 (Tex. Cr.App.), on remand 850 S.W.2d 230 (Tex. App. — Texarkana 1993). On appeal appellant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial based on misconduct by both a juror and the prosecutor during voir dire. The court of…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- De La Rosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Gentry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Enriquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by150 opinions
- Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Fry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.