Pannell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
McCORMICK, Judge.
On original submission, a panel of this Court held that appellant, after having counsel appointed for him, waived his right *97to counsel and gave a voluntary confession to authorities. We granted appellant’s motion for leave to file his motion for rehearing to consider, among other things, the fourth ground of error which was raised in his original brief but not specifically addressed by the panel opinion.
Appellant contends that because the district attorney interviewed appellant without attempting to obtain the consent of his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brasfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Drumm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- United States v. Billy Gene ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Jeffers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Rocha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Atkinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.