Leatherbury v. Reagan
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.
While the assignment of error is that the sustaining of a motion for summary judgment was contrary to law, the single issue raised and argued was whether appellant, who worked as a sales manager in real estate activities for another as a regular employee, was entitled to recover compensation without having a real estate license as required by R.C. 4735.21.
The trial court ruled that in order to come within the exceptions enumerated in R.C. 4735.01(E) a regular employee must own the real estate in question or acquire it on his own account. Since appellant did not own or acquire any interest in…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ohio Division of Real Estate v. VantellOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hackett v. Moore, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County2010
- Landmark Commercial Realty, Inc. v. Developers Diversified, Ltd., and W & M PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Landmark Commercial Realty, Inc. v. Developers Diversified, Ltd., and W & M PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Smith v. LurieOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.