Legal Opinion

Leatherbury v. Reagan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1987No. 9944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

While the assignment of error is that the sustaining of a motion for summary judgment was contrary to law, the single issue raised and argued was whether appellant, who worked as a sales manager in real estate activities for another as a regular employee, was entitled to recover compensation without having a real estate license as required by R.C. 4735.21.

The trial court ruled that in order to come within the exceptions enumerated in R.C. 4735.01(E) a regular employee must own the real estate in question or acquire it on his own account. Since appellant did not own or acquire any interest in…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ohio Division of Real Estate v. VantellOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Hackett v. Moore, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County2010
  3. Landmark Commercial Realty, Inc. v. Developers Diversified, Ltd., and W & M PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Landmark Commercial Realty, Inc. v. Developers Diversified, Ltd., and W & M PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Smith v. LurieOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API