Legal Opinion

Landmark Commercial Realty, Inc. v. Developers Diversified, Ltd., and W & M Properties

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1999No. 97-3602Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

163 F.3d 389

LANDMARK COMMERCIAL REALTY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED, LTD., and W & M Properties,

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 97-3602.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued July 30, 1998.

Decided Dec. 18, 1998.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 10, 1999.

Marvin L. Karp (argued and briefed), Ulmer & Berne, LLP, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Paul P. Psota (briefed), Chattman, Gaines & Stern, Cleveland, OH, Alan G. Starkoff (argued and briefed), Chattman, Gaines & Stern, Independence, OH, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: NELSON, BOGGS, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.

2Opinion of the Court · NelsonNelson, J., joined by Clay, J.,

BOGGS, J.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Ferncrest Court Partners, Ltd., Debtor. Akram Daniel v. Amci, Inc. Corson & Buckey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. S. D. Stanson, Inc. v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Leatherbury v. ReaganOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Maglione v. WojnoOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Kramer v. Roth, Jr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API