Legal Opinion
Landmark Commercial Realty, Inc. v. Developers Diversified, Ltd., and W & M Properties
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1999No. 97-3602PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J., joined by Clay, J.,
BOGGS, J. (pp. 11-12), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
Under Ohio Rev.Code § 4735.21, a person who performs real estate brokerage services is denied a right of action to collect compensation therefor unless the person has been licensed either as a real estate broker or, in certain situations, as a foreign real estate dealer.
The case at bar is' a diversity action brought by a Florida real estate broker to collect compensation for brokerage services performed in connection with an Ohio real estate transaction. The dispositive question on appeal is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Ferncrest Court Partners, Ltd., Debtor. Akram Daniel v. Amci, Inc. Corson & Buckey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- S. D. Stanson, Inc. v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Leatherbury v. ReaganOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Maglione v. WojnoOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
- Kramer v. Roth, Jr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Landmark Commercial Realty, Inc. v. Developers Diversified, Ltd., and W & M PropertiesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999