Legal Opinion
David Wayne Wilson v. Lura Merritt, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 4, 2026No. 1:22-cv-00455Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID WAYNE WILSON, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00455-JLT-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. AND A PARTIAL STAY OF DISCOVERY 14 LURA MERRITT, et al., (Doc. 92) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff David Wayne Wilson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth 19 Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Correa,1 20 Merritt and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- William Hunt v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States ex rel. O'Connell v. Chapman UniversityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Nutratech, Inc. v. Syntech (SSPF) International, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- The Freedom Republicans, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.