Legal Opinion

Grimstad v. Knudsen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 2016No. C113324CV; A154574 (Control), A152322PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

This case is a dispute over the proceeds from a sale of real property. The property in question, a house in Durham, Oregon (the Durham property), was once owned by Madeline Grimstad and her husband, Neal Grimstad. Through a codicil to her will (the second codicil), Madeline left the Durham property to plaintiffs—her stepchildren and Neal’s biological children—if Neal predeceased her, and if she owned the property at the time of her death. The second codicil was the only specific devise in Madeline’s will, and defendants—Madeline’s biological children—were the residuary devisees under the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Allen v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Smith v. RubelOregon Supreme Court · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sharma v. Providence Health & Services-OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Sanford v. Hampton Res., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Cumming v. NippingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Pistol Resources, LLC v. McNeelyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Lumford v. OtaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API