Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rubel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1932PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Preceding the trial the parties agreed upon the facts constituting the foundation of the action and thereupon signed a stipulation to which we shall now refer. August 5, 1930, the defendant owned 40 shares of the Class B capital stock of the Time-Q-Stat Controls Company of Elkhart, Indiana. The Class A stock of that corporation was listed on the Chicago Stock Exchange and sold at $25.00 per share. The Class B stock was not listed upon any exchange, and its sale was effected in Chicago, Indianapolis, Minneapolis, Milwaukee and Elkhart in a manner described in the stipulation as “over the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scott v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Allen v. M. Mendelsohn & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Scott v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Grand Lodge v. TowneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. Hibbs v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Aebli v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. National Shawmut Bank v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Albino v. AlbinoOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hogan v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API