Legal Opinion

Cumming v. Nipping

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2017No. 161224954; A157419PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

This case arises from a family dispute over a condominium in California, which we refer to as Seagate. Plaintiff understood that, after the deaths of her father and stepmother, Seagate would pass to her unencumbered, by operation of a family trust. Although plaintiff eventually acquired ownership of Seagate, it was by then encumbered by a deed of trust. For reasons that we explain below, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants that included an unjust enrichment claim to recover the equity lost by the encumbrance. After a bench trial, the trial court denied that claim. Having reviewed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tupper v. RoanOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Cron v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Winters v. County of ClatsopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Newton v. PickellOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Grimstad v. KnudsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cumming v. NippingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Phillips Sisson Industries, Inc. v. HysellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Cumming v. NippingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Cumming v. NippingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Farmer v. Thar Process, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API