Legal Opinion

Allen v. Hall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1999No. USDC CV-96-00563-JJ; USCA 96-35996; SC S45130PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This case is before the court on two certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See ORS 28.200 et seq. (providing for certification of certain questions of Oregon law from specified federal courts and appellate courts of other states to Oregon Supreme Court). As framed by the Ninth Circuit, the questions are:

1. Does Oregon recognize the tort of intentional interference with prospective inheritance?

2. If a tort action for intentional interference with prospective inheritance is available, what are the elements of that tort?

Framed more narrowly, the two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Gardner v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Beckwith v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Grange Insurance v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Frakes v. NayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API