Legal Opinion
Mirich v. Underwriter's at Lloyd's London
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 1944No. Civ. 14149PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.
Plaintiff recovered a judgment against William E. Balsinger for malpractice in the sum of $3,850, of which amount she was able to collect only $313. Dr. Balsinger was insured by defendant herein under a policy which ran in favor of any person who might obtain judgment against him within its indemnity provisions. Plaintiff brought the present suit on the policy to collect the unpaid amount of her judgment. The company in its defense alleged that Dr. Balsinger had obtained the policy by means of false statements in his application and that it had been rescinded by the company for fraud,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Telford v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Iverson v. Metropolitan Life Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- McDanels v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- California-Western States Life Insurance v. FeinstenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Val's Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Williamson & Vollmer Engineering, Inc. v. Sequoia InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Squire's Department Store, Inc. v. DudumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Ellis v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.