McDanels v. General Insurance Co. of America
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, J., pro tem.
Appellant was injured in an automobile accident and a judgment for personal injuries therein sustained was recovered by him against one Haag, who at the time of the accident was the assured in a public liability insurance policy issued by respondent companies. Many continuances of the trial of the personal injury action were obtained by counsel appearing of record for Haag, such counsel being provided for him to defend said action by respondent companies. These continuances were made to appear necessary in order to secure the presence of Haag, who was charged personally…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Miller v. Union Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Coolidge v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Daly v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Hines v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Insurance Co. of the West v. Haralambos Beverage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Val's Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Association of Owners of Kukui Plaza v. Swinerton & Walberg Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1985
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.