Legal Opinion

Black v. Suydam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1914No. 11773PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered June 6, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage, after decreeing a sale in parcels, upon the trial of an issue between defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

— This is an action to foreclose a mortgage, given by the defendant Suydam to Stevenson-Sanders Land Company, covering forty acres of land, and by that company assigned to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs asked a personal judgment against the defendant Denny as guarantor. The mortgage was not contested by any of the defendants. Trimble and wife answered, admitting the mortgage and its priority, and claiming ownership of the entire forty-acre tract.

Wright, as executor and trustee of the estate of W. Hammond Wright, deceased, answered, claiming a contract of purchase for a specifically described…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. SuydamWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Coliseum Investment Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Solicitors Loan & Trust Co. v. Washington & Idaho RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bartlett Estate Co. v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against LynchWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Washington Asphalt Co. v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Haueter v. RancichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Bode v. RhodesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Fullerton Savings Bank v. Des GrangesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API