Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Lynch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1990No. 1135PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

— John S. Lynch III, an attorney admitted to practice in this state, appeals a decision of the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association suspending him for 6 months. He claims that procedures at the Board's hearing violated his due process rights. We conclude that the suspension for 6 months was an insufficient sanction for the conduct involved. We determine, on the basis of the limited record before us, that Appellant Lynch should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of 2 years.

Appellant Lynch was admitted to the Washington State Bar on October 27, 1975. At all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. United States v. Christopher D. WilmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against RentelWashington Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Matter of DannWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API