Haueter v. Rancich
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
— Robert H. Rancich and his wife purchased a vendor's interest in a real estate contract covering seven residential lots. Because the contract was in default, Ran-cich brought a judicial forfeiture action, but neglected to join Robert Haueter and his wife, subsequent purchasers of two of the seven lots. The Haueters responded with the present action to quiet title to their two parcels. The trial court quieted title in the Haueters' name, provided they pay Rancich a sum equal to the original contract's deed release price for the two lots plus some contract interest, back taxes, attorney's fees…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Kendrick v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Bennett v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Nelson v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Kobza v. TrippCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Eichorn v. LunnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Robert Gunn, V Terry & Petra RielyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017