Bostwick v. . Van Voorhis
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the'Supreme Court, in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made September 12, 1882, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee. The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtEabl, J.
This action was' brought by plaintiff, as receiver of the National Bank of Fishkill, against the defendant, as sole executor of Coert A. Van Voorhis, deceased, who was one of the sureties upon the official bond of Alexander Bartow, cashier of the bank. The bond was joint and several and was signed by Bartow and six sureties, and the conditions thereof were as follows: “ Whereas the above bounden Alexander Bartow has been duly appointed cashier of the said National Bank of Fishkill: Now if the said Alexander Bartow shall well, honestly and faithfully discharge the duties of such cashier,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Board of Supervisors v. . OtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Tapley v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Graves v. Lebanon National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873
- Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Co. v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rachman Bag Company, a Partnership Composed of Plains Bag and Bagging Co., Inc., and Rachman Bag Co., Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Hamlet at Willow Creek Development Co. v. Northeast Land Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- State of New York v. Peerless Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Aetna Indemnity Co. v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Marine Midland Bank v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.