Legal Opinion

Allegheny County v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 9, 1963No. Appeals, Nos. 41, 42, and 43PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This is an appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission permitting the Pittsburgh Railways Company to temporarily discontinue the operation of the Castle Shannon Incline Plane between Bailey Avenue and East Carson Street in Pittsburgh, a distance of approximately 1,350 feet.

The Railways Company filed a petition on April 19, 1962, to abandon service on the incline plane. The County of Allegheny, the City of Pittsburgh and Harry A. Estep, Esq., a lawyer and a user of the incline plane, filed objections. This petition and thirty-two other petitions…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Scranton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Paradise v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API