Legal Opinion

Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 214, 215, 216, 217, 218 and 219PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

These six appeals challenge an order of the Superior Court1 which affirmed an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission placing upon the Delaware River Port Authority (herein called the Authority) the entire cost of relocating certain facilities of the Philadelphia Electric Company (herein called the Electric Company).

The problems which these appeals ' present arise from the construction by the Authority of the Walt Whitman bridge which spans the Delaware River between Philadelphia and Gloucester, N. J.2 The order of the Commission presently…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Transit Commission v. Long Island RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Buradus v. General Cement Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Day v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Delaware River Port Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. Nenna & Frain, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Rich v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1959

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API