Roll v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
It is not surprising that the power to cite and punish for contempt of court is at times misunderstood by judges asserting it, by appellate courts reviewing it, and by legislatures enacting laws involving it. The law concerning contempt cries for specificity in definition and uniformity in application. It is ofttimes perplexing and sometimes uncertain. * 1 That its confusions may not be as serious in the overall administration of justice as are caused, for example, by the difficulties arising from the subtle dis tinctions with respect to offenses comprising the unlawful appropriation of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Roll and SchollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Pearson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Savage v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.