Legal Opinion
Pearson v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 3, 1975No. 19, September Term, 1975PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, C. J.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Three criminal informations charging violations of the laws concerning controlled dangerous substances were filed in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against JON FREDERICK PEARSON, Deborah Lee Royston, Edward Robert Hicks, James Robert Collett and Fred James Raduazo. When the informations came on for trial, Hicks and Raduazo failed to appear. The State proceeded against Pearson, Royston and Collett. The defense stated that the three informations arose out of “one search, one arrest, one incident which occurred on May 22nd, 1973.” The court, at the request of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- County Commissioners for Carroll County v. Forty West Builders, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Driggs Corp. v. Maryland Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Sorrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.