Legal Opinion
State v. Booth
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 2003No. C.A. No. 02CA0061-MPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carr, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Janella J. Booth, appeals the decision of the Medina Municipal Court, which found her guilty of operating a vehicle with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration. This court affirms.
I
{¶ 2} On April 21, 2001, appellant was arrested and cited for operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol content, driving under the influence of alcohol, failure to stop at a red light, and failure to wear a safety belt.
{¶ 3} The instrument check solution used to calibrate the BAC DataMaster in this case is known as lot number 00120, bottle number 437. According to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. PlummerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. SotoOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. SnowbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. CurleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.