State v. Plummer

In the case sub judice appellant contends that in order for a urinalysis test result to be admissible in a prosecution under R.C. 4511.19,1 the urine sample must be treated in compliance with the *294regulation set forth in the Ohio Adm. Code 3701-53-05(F). For the following reasons, we find that there has been substantial compliance with this regulation and affirm appellant’s conviction.

Appellant’s test result showed a urine-alcohol content of twenty hundredths of a gram by weight per one hundred milliliters of his urine, in excess of the statutory limit set forth in R.C. 4511.19(A)(4). Whether…