Legal Opinion
State v. Soto
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 19, 2017No. 16CA011024PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALLAHAN, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, the State of Ohio, appeals from the judgment of the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, granting Appellee, Vittorio Soto's, motion to suppress. For the reasons set forth below, this Court reverses.
I
{¶ 2} Mr. Soto was indicted on two counts of rape involving a person less than 10 years of age. Prior to his arrest, Mr. Soto was interviewed by Detective Tabitha Angello at the Lorain Police Department. During the interview, Mr. Soto gave a videotaped statement wherein he admitted the allegations. Mr. Soto moved to suppress all of his statements made during the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MartucciOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. NicholsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. PerezOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.